What Make Teacher's Stay?

Research Design

Stability in the teacher workforce is a factor associated with successful PK12 schools (Ronfeldt, Loeb, & Wyckoff, 2013). However, teacher turnover and attrition is a growing problem both nationally and within Virginia. Research on trends in the teacher workforce has shown increased numbers of teachers transferring between schools and, in many cases, leaving the profession. This problem is especially apparent among early career teachers, where it is estimated that more than half leave teaching in the first five years of service (Ingersoll, 2001; Papay, Bacher-Hicks, Page, & Marinell, 2017). There are also particular content areas where shortages of teachers are the highest; this includes Special Education, Elementary Education, Middle Education, Career and Technical Education, and Science and Math (for example see Virginia Department of Education, Commonwealth of Virginia Critical Shortage Teaching Endorsement Areas 2018-19). This problem cannot be understated, as there is evidence that fewer teachers are choosing to enter the profession (Darling-Hammond & Sykes, 2003; Ingersoll, 2001, 2002; US Department of Education, 2015).

All of this puts a financial burden on school divisions. The total costs for teacher absences nationwide in 2004 were estimated at $25 billion dollars (District Management Council, 2004). A pattern of continual teacher turnover exacts financial and organizational costs, with teacher attrition costing the United States as much as $2.2 billion a year. (Guin, 2004; Ingersoll, 2001; Ronfeldt, Loeb, & Wyckoff, 2013; Simon & Johnson, 2013; Alliance for Excellent Education, 2014). Associated costs of teacher turnover include new teacher hiring, training and professional development (Barnes, Crowe, & Schaefer, 2007; Kraft, Marinell, & Yee, 2016; Darling-Hammond & Sykes, 2003; Ronfeldt, Loeb, & Wyckoff, 2013)

It is also important to note that both the problem of teacher attrition and the intensity of these negative effects are most profound in the schools with the highest needs (Clotfelter, Ladd, & Vigdor, 2007; Allensworth, Ponisciak, & Mazzeo, 2009; Marinell & Coca, 2013; Barnes et al., 2007; Darling-Hammond & Sykes, 2003; Ronfeldt, Loeb, & Wyckoff, 2013; Ingersoll, 2001).
In the spring of 2018, the Policy and Planning Council of the Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium (MERC) voted to commission a study on teacher retention that would provide insights into the phenomenon and practical recommendations for policy and practice. Following the selection of the topic, MERC assembled a research team that included faculty and graduate students from VCU’s School of Education and key school personnel from the seven MERC school divisions. The research team met on a regular basis through the summer and fall to develop research questions and design a study.

GOALS

There are four goals that guide this study.
1. To develop a better understanding of the factors underlying the current patterns of teacher retention in the MERC region.
2. To support the development of district data practices that will allow for tracking teacher retention and understanding the factors driving it.
3. To conduct evaluation of current state and local policies focused on teacher retention to determine impact and cost/benefit.
4. To build a regional community of educational researchers and school leaders with professional expertise in the area of teacher retention.

STUDY COMPONENTS

Analysis of State Working Conditions Survey Data

MERC obtained the results from the 2019 VDOE Working Conditions Survey. The survey results were analyzed to understand the relationship between teachers’ experiences of work and their intent to stay or leave their current school. The results of this analysis are shared in “Will They Stay or Will They Go? Analysis of the VDOE 2019 Working Conditions Survey.”

Teacher Exit Survey

In 2019, Members of the research team collaborated with members of the study team as well as area directors of human resources to develop a common teacher exit survey, based on local and state models. For the past two years the survey has become the standard exit survey in five of the MERC school divisions.


Teacher Induction Cost Benefit Analysis

We currently have a team conducting a cross-case cost benefit analysis of the teacher induction programs in three MERC school divisions. This study involved document collection and conversations with school division leaders to determine the structures of programs and the costs. Using VDOE retention data, these costs were then analyzed in relation to the retention of early career teachers. A report on the findings will be shared in the fall of 2021.

Teacher Retention Policy Analysis

The policy analysis team completed interviews with school representatives about division-level policies focused on teacher retention according to five criteria 1) economic decisions, 2) avenues into the profession, 3) hiring strategies and policies, 4) professional development, and 5) working conditions. Our team analyzed interview transcripts and developed a matrix as well as brief narratives that are under member check with division representatives. A comparative report on division-level policy will be shared in the fall of 2021.

Analysis of State Retention Data

MERC obtained VDOE workforce data that includes information about retention of personnel across Virginia between 2007 and 2018. This data is currently being used to support our Cost Benefit Analysis of teacher induction programs, our cross-division policy analysis, and a Spencer Grant application on teacher induction in Virginia. This data will also be used to publish a series of short research briefs on trends in teacher retention. Proposed topics include: “Leadership retention and teacher retention”, “Principal- Teacher Match: Understanding the relationship between the presence of school leaders of color and retention of teachers of color”, and “Understanding the relationship between teacher retention and licensure”. These briefs will be released through the fall and winter of 2021.

Professional Development

MERC is currently designing online professional development resources based on work from this study. This will start with modules built out of an analysis of the MERC Experience of Work Survey. The goal with this initiative is to develop short professional learning modules for school leaders that encourage engagement with research literature and local data, and reflection on the leadership practices that influence the working conditions of teachers, and intent to stay.

Team

PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS

Jonathan BeckerVCU SOE Educational Leadership

Val RobnoltVCU SOE Teaching and Learning

Elizabeth EdmondsonVCU SOE Teaching and Learning

CO-PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS

Adria HoffmanVCU SOE Teaching and Learning

Andrene CastroVCU SOE Educational Leadership

Jesse SenechalMERC/VCU SOE Foundations

David NaffMERC/VCU SOE Foundations

GRADUATE RESEARCH ASSISTANTS

Angela Allen, VCU SOE Urban Services Leadership

Jodi Larson, VCU SOE Curriculum, Culture, and Change

Jacqueline Wilson, VCU SOE Curriculum, Culture, and Change

Stephanie Moore, VCU SOE Research, Assessment, and Evaluation

Brooke Spotts, VCU SOE Curriculum, Culture, and Change